|
ABC Approach to HIV
Prevention
|
“For women
worldwide, being young and married are most significant risk
factors for acquiring HIV infection. Married women or women who
do not have control over if they have sex cannot choose
abstinence. And many women who have contracted HIV infection
from their husbands or long-term partners were faithful” |
“Condoms are an integral and essential part of
comprehensive HIV/AIDS prevention and care programmes, and their
promotion must be accelerated,” read a position statement issued by a
couple of United Nations agencies, at the end of XV International AIDS
Conference (IAC) Bangkok. Earlier, nearly 20,000 delegates who
participated in six-day IAC held in July this year witnessed a
passionate debate amongst advocates of US Agency for International
Development (USAID) sponsored “ABC Approach to HIV Prevention” and
dissenters who called it “paternalistic and prescriptive”.
“ABC” approach builds upon three fundamental prerequisite that can
prevent or reduce the likelihood of sexual transmission of AIDS virus;
A-for abstinence, B-for being faithful and C-for consistent condom
use, especially for casual sexual activity and other high-risk
situations.
Uganda is considered one of the world’s earliest success stories in
confronting AIDS pandemic using “ABC” approach. According to estimates
by UNAIDS and U.S. Census Bureau, the national prevalence (of HIV)
peaked at around 15 percent in the early 1990s and fell to 5 percent
by 2001 in Uganda. According to USAID this decline in prevalence was
associated with a positive change in all three “ABC” behaviors. The
country indeed reported a 60% decline in casual sex encounters, with
Ugandan men and women exhibiting faithfulness or partner-reduction
behaviour. The highest reduction was in the 15 - 29-year age group.
The scenario in nearby Botswana, where 58% of adult population was HIV
positive in 2002 is gloomy. Ms Serea Mogwe of the School of Nursing at
the University of Botswana, who was in Bangkok to participate in IAC,
speculated over the reasons of failure of AIDS prevention programme in
her impoverished country. She recalled that when in 1986, first person
tested positive for HIV in Botswana, the government launched a massive
education campaign with emphasis on condoms promotion. The slogan of
the campaign was, “lock out AIDS with condoms". Ms Mogwe wonders if
this was not a grave mistake. People seem to have developed "take the
condoms and have fun" attitude. The onus of HIV prevention was
apparently transferred from community to condoms, she lamented. She
believes that her country should have placed equal stress on behaviour
change, but this was missing from the programme.
A number of AIDS activists and experts fear that “ABC” does not offer
a holistic approach to HIV prevention especially for women and young
people.
Zeda Rosenberg in an impassioned presentation at the conference
stated, “For women worldwide, being young and married are most
significant risk factors for acquiring HIV infection. Married women or
women who do not have control over if they have sex cannot choose
abstinence. And many women who have contracted HIV infection from
their husbands or long-term partners were faithful”.
Dr. Quarrisha Abdool Karim who addressed one of the plenary sessions
at the IAC said, “Abstinence and life-long mutually faithful
monogamous relationships are critical to reduce the number of
discordant sexual acts, and should be promoted as part of any
comprehensive prevention strategy”. But she also said that condoms,
when used properly are 97 percent effective in preventing transmission
of HIV through sexual contact.
Raoul Fransen of Young Positives said, ” The “ABC” approach, simply
does not fit into the worldview or actual life of so many young
people. It does not recognize our sexual or reproductive rights and
does not provide workable options for women in particular, and even
less for young women”.
“Rather than being taught not to have sex, young people-with or
without HIV-should be enabled to make the choice-be this abstinence or
partner reduction or having access to condoms-that is right for them”
he adds.
Ms. Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, Executive Director of United Nations
Population Fund in an effort to tread the middle path pleaded “It is
time for leaders and policymakers to stop arguing about the merits of
condom versus abstinence, because both are options for young people in
different settings.”
USAID itself recognizes the need for balance of A, B and C
interventions. It agrees that in Southeast Asia HIV is still largely
confined to high-risk populations, in which correct and consistent use
condom use is easy to implement.
Dr. Malcolm Potts of University of California talking to the author
explained that active promotion of condoms amongst commercial sex
workers and men having sex with men could play a key role in reversal
of AIDS epidemic in India.
“ABC” approach nevertheless addresses one hitherto neglected element
in HIV prevention strategies that is partner reduction and fidelity.
Amid debate over abstinence versus condoms, “B” could become
centerpiece of unifying evidence based ABC approach as suggested by
experience in countries like Uganda and Thailand.
|